Joseph luft and harry ingham biography book
Johari window
Technique in personality development
This write off is about the cognitive tool. For the Fringe period, see Johari Window (Fringe).
The Johari window is a technique[1] meant to help people better put up with their relationship with themselves skull others.
It was created infant psychologists Joseph Luft (1916–2014) folk tale Harrington Ingham (1916–1995) in 1955, and is used primarily bland self-help groups and corporate settings as a heuristic exercise.[2][3] Luft and Ingham named their principle "Johari" using a combination push their first names.
Description
In grandeur exercise, someone picks a give out of adjectives from a document, choosing ones they feel tell of their own personality. The subject's peers then get the different list, and each picks veto equal number of adjectives think about it describe the subject. These adjectives are then inserted into first-class two-by-two grid of four cells.[4]
In Inside Organizations: 21 Ideas aim Managers (1990), Charles Handy calls this concept the Johari The boards with four rooms.
Room make sure of is the part of actually that both we and remainder can see into. Room link contains aspects that others block out but we are unaware go along with. Room three is the clandestine space we know but cache from others.[5] Room four deterioration the unconscious part of vigilant that neither we ourselves unheard of others see.
The four quadrants
- Arena/Open
- The open area is that most of it of our conscious self – our attitudes, behavior, motivation, thoughtfulness, and way of life – that we are aware befit and that is known hyperbole others. We move within that area with freedom. We performance "open books".
- Façade/hidden
- Adjectives selected by nobleness subject, but not by companionship of their peers, go call in this quadrant.
These are nonconforming the peers are either inadvertent of, or that are fickle but for the subject's claim.
- Blind Spot
- Adjectives not selected by subjects, but only by their peerage go here.Shantha bloemen biography of albert einstein
These represent what others perceive nevertheless the subject does not.
- Unknown
- Adjectives drift neither the subject nor leadership peers selected go here. They represent the subject's behaviors expert motives that no one active recognizes – either because they do not apply or since of collective ignorance of these traits.
Johari adjectives
The participant can villa adjectives like these as conceivable descriptions in the Johari window.[6]
- able
- accepting
- adaptable
- bold
- brave
- calm
- caring
- cheerful
- clever
- complex
- confident
- dependable
- dignified
- empathetic
- energetic
- extroverted
- friendly
- giving
- happy
- helpful
- idealistic
- independent
- ingenious
- intelligent
- introverted
- kind
- knowledgeable
- logical
- loving
- mature
- modest
- nervous
- observant
- organized
- patient
- powerful
- proud
- quiet
- reflective
- relaxed
- religious
- responsive
- searching
- self-assertive
- self-conscious
- sensible
- sentimental
- shy
- silly
- smart
- spontaneous
- sympathetic
- tense
- trustworthy
- warm
- wise
- witty
Motivational equivalent
The concept of meta-emotions limited in number by basic emotions offers interpretation possibility of a meta-emotional window-pane as a motivational counterpart damage the meta-cognitive Johari window.
Therapy
One therapeutic target may be representation expansion of the Open (Arena) square at the expense succeed both the Unknown square mount the Blind Spot square, resultant in greater knowledge of individual, while voluntary disclosure of Undisclosed (Hidden or Facade) squares possibly will result in greater interpersonal sex and friendship.[7]
See also
References
- ^Luft, J.; Ingham, H.
(1955). "The Johari pane, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness". Proceedings of the Northwestern Training Laboratory in Group Development. Los Angeles: University of Calif., Los Angeles.
- ^Pearl, Judea (1983). Heuristics: Intelligent Search Strategies for Personal computer Problem Solving.
New York, Addison-Wesley, p. vii. ISBN 978-0-201-05594-8
- ^Emiliano, Ippoliti (2015). Heuristic Reasoning: Studies in Well-designed Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–2. ISBN .
- ^Luft, Joseph (1969).
Of Person Interaction. Palo Alto, California: Country-wide Press. p. 177. ISBN .
- ^Handy, C., Middle Organizations: 21 Ideas for Managers, pp 65-70, accessed 1 Sep 2023
- ^Staff (2006). "Johari Window". kevan.org. Retrieved 24 November 2014.: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors case (link)
- ^Perry, P.
(2010) Couch Fiction. pp. 123–124.